Test Case CSIP103

CSIP103

Testable: FALSE
Schema Valid: Valid
Description: CSIP103 seems identical to CSIP101, but the authors of the specification had a distinction in mind: "… the first requirement defines whether the division itself is mandatory, the second defines the required label value," see the issue "Redundancies and incompatible priority levels" at https://github.com/DILCISBoard/E-ARK-CSIP/issues/570. The cases of there being no 'Representations' division or more than one 'Representations' division are handled in CSIP101. Consequently, there is only one rule left for CSIP103: If the 'Representations' division exists, it MUST have @LABEL='Representations'. This, however, is not reliably testable with algorithms of reasonable complexity. Detecting a representations division that is not marked @LABEL='Representations' would require analysing indirect indicators (e.g. a structMap/div with references to files in the /representations folder), but these cannot give enough confidence to announce a violation of a MUST rule. In sum, only valid IPs are meaningful for CSIP103 and the requirement is effectively not testable.